![]() |
Remnants of Chernobyl [Photo: CC0] |

My rating: 5 of 5 stars
A Different Point of View
![]() |
Remnants of Chernobyl [Photo: CC0] |
![]() |
Jack Kerouac. Photo by Tom Palumbo [CC BY-SA 2.0]. |
Perception is our Essential Mind; the sun's brightness or the dim moon's darkness are the conditional ripples on its surface... the phenomena that the sense-organs perceive does not originate in our Essential Mind but in the senses themselves.
Do not be disturbed by what has been taught, but ponder upon it seriously and never give yourself up either to sadness or delight.
...it is the eyes, not the intrinsic perception of Mind, that is subject to false mistakes.
There is neither Truth nor Non-Truth, there is only the essence. And when we intuit the essence of all, we call it Essential Mind.
...prepare quietly a quiet place, be not moved by others' way of thinking, do not compromise to agree with the ignorance of others, go thou alone, make solitude thy paradise...
As I am a conqueror amid conquerors, so he who conquers 'self' is one with me.
Draft paper presented to the Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society via Zoom, University of Canberra, 28 September 2020.
Historical institutionalism (HI) is often regarded as the least rigorous and the more tautological of the ‘new institutionalisms’, but this reputation is undeserved. I argue that HI, when viewed as a method for, rather than a theory of, examining institutional stasis and change, can provide a rigorous approach to process tracing that is useful in examining the impact of institutional legacies on contemporary political issues. Famous HI scholars, including Kathleen Thelen, suggest that systematic approaches to comparative temporal analyses can help to overcome the shortcomings of the inductive method in comparative politics. While for Karl Popper the inductive method is, in effect, hopeless in its scientific utility, my contention is that the nature of the social sciences means that falsifiability is, for the most part, a bridge too far for comparative political research. Plausibility, as opposed to falsifiability, can be achieved using systematic HI processes that are more sophisticated than simply rummaging through the past to find evidence that supports a given hypothesis. In this seminar, I aim to present a method that is not only useful in conducting comparative political analysis over time, but that can also address some of the inevitable shortcomings inherent in the conduct of inductive, comparative political science research by providing a systematic and rigorous system of process tracing over time.